RSS
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

the rite stuff

the rite’ is not your basic horror movie. in fact i would say it’s more of a supernatural thriller, and this is not a brainless supernatural thriller. it is in fact a very religious movie.
you will find contorting bodies, weird voices, and much hissing spitting freakiness and general unpleasantness [but only 1 f-bomb and very little other bad language] but it is a movie containing exorcisms, so be warned.
the director mikael håfström [1408] presents a genuine portrayal of a christian view of the spirit world and the devil is portrayed with cunning and as a deceiver. the movie does not shy away or water down the faith and beliefs of those involved, and the theology is treated seriously. obviously there are some added dramatic effects as you would expect [creepy cats and shadows etc], but this does not take away from this story of a doubting priest and his exorcising friend and scene stealer, sir hopkins. in fact the trailer implies that the movie is about hopkins’ character, but it is not. the “inspired by true events” story is about a young man called michael kovak, who follows the path to become a priest simply to escape the family business of embalming the dead [btw – it’s great to see rutger hauer back on the big screen]. at the end of his four years of study he is expected to take the priestly vows, but he has no plans to do so as he is unsure of what he believes in. since the death of his mother when he was a boy he has doubted the existence of god and all that goes with it, and prefers to try and explain everything away scientifically or through reason.
however, a fellow priest senses his internal conflict and recommends he spend some time at the vatican, where he is placed in the tutorage of an old welsh exorcist named lucas. lucas’ role is simply to convince the doubting priest that the spiritual realm is real and alive and kicking.
this might be a strange thing to say but i think christians will get the most out of this movie, or youth leaders who are looking for a springboard for discussions with older teens.
it’s incredibly well made, very foreboding and often scary. But it is slow and ponderous for a reason, and that is because it is about the priest’s journey and not specifically the horror he encounters.
ultimately it is rare for a movie to present us with a genuine faith journey toward belief in jesus christ, and for that reason alone, you can’t go wrong with ‘the rite’!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

“choose life!”

this movie could be considered to be a lesson to kids: if you’re going off somewhere… leave a note!
it can also be considered as a lesson to us all. let me extrapolate somewhat.
i watched 127 hours a while back [and raved about it on facebook] but never got round to writing a full review for it – so here goes.
danny boyle should be a national treasure. from stolen money to zombies and astronauts to slumdogs - the man is a genius in whatever he does. even ‘the beach’, while not his best work, still shows better craftsmanship and understanding of what makes a great movie than the majority of stuff other directors have produced in the last decade.
his last movie continues that success. everyone and his dog knows the story behind this movie. rock climber falls, rock climber’s arm gets trapped by boulder, rock climber must escape or die, rock climber lops arm off, rock climber learns life lesson. it could be a grim tale and with a lesser director it may well have ended up an absolute snorefest. but it didn’t… and it isn’t.
now, the problem with this ‘true story’ is that we already know how it turns out so the main dramatic elements will not come as a surprise. because we know this, and director knows we know this, he has to pad out his tale somewhat! this is where it could have got really tedious. but boyle mixes the flashbacks, hallucinations, and his use of cameras and extreme close-ups to tell a gripping story [sorry].
i love the fact that it’s only when he becomes trapped that we are presented with the movie’s title: 127 hours- the period of time aron finds himself in this horrifying situation. now he’s beginning to panic, and so do we. he tries everything to free his arm and finally comes to the realisation that there really is only one way he is going to survive. I cannot talk about this movie without mentioning “the bit with the arm”. this is handled in a very clever way and is completely realistic, while being in no way gratuitous. be warned, the intricate severing of his arm is brutal, and even though i had prepared myself for this act, it turns out i wasn’t that prepared at all!
now, what begins as a tragic story is ultimately an uplifting movie of the fight to survive. A fight that we all have within us, that we act out every day. We go to work to earn money to survive, we eat and drink to survive, we spend time alone to survive the noise, we spend time with friends and loved ones to survive the loneliness.  
it’s a brilliant film, and i heartily recommend you see it.

we can sometimes [unknowingly] get trapped in our own canyon – staring at the walls with no way of escape. but we aren’t as trapped as we think we are. if we release ourselves from this existence from time to time – to experience the wonder of god’s creation in the open air, or the company of a close friend who we’ve been too busy to see, it can make all the difference to our existence.
we were not created to work, we were created to be.
so maybe it’s time to look up and stop working… and start being.
as one of boyle’s famous characters once said, “choose life!”.

“i call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that i have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live,”
Deut 30:19

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

what if...?

for me, when it comes to sci-fi movies i like them cooked a certain way. much of the sci-fi movies that get released are aimed at people with adhd, they are big and shiny but rather empty within. you don’t have to look far to see what i mean, watch transformers for 20 minutes and it’s enough to send anyone into a twitchy fit!..
my introduction to the genre included classics such as star wars, mad max, close encounters, back to the future, the black hole, planet of the apes, westworld, invasion of the body snatchers, the fly and the like. I tended to veer towards sci-fi tv too with shows like doctor who, buck rogers, battlestar galactica, logan’s run, otherworld, the twilight zone, and of course the prisoner all moulding me and filling my mind with tales of wonder, danger, and adventure.
these days, in a world where there is rarely a movie made that doesn’t have cgi and 3d, the sci-fi genre has for the most part been swallowed up by whizz bang effects and audio and big greedy companies out to bleed as much money as possible from the unsuspecting public for utter twaddle. but there’s hope… occasionally you get a slice of fiction that really makes you think. 2001, moon, solaris, and even minority report fit into this drawer – as does ‘the man from earth’.
this movie is about a guy called john oldman who is getting ready to leave his town to start a new life. while packing his truck he is descended upon by a handful of work colleagues who plan to give him a little celebratory send off, and more urgently to figure out why he is suddenly leaving. he tells them that
he moves every 10 years or so when people begin to suspect him of not aging - he is in fact 14,000 years old.
so begins one of the best sci-fi movies i’ve seen in recent years. but this isn’t sci-fi of the inception or avatar kind. this is a slice of science fiction set in one room with no cgi or strange creatures or moving walls… just a roaring open fire, comfy chairs, wine, and 6 friends trying to work all this out.
this is psychological sci-fi. it’s a “what if…?” movie, and we get to see what these friends think of and ask mr oldman [love the choice of name]. they are all experts in their fields, biology, archaeology, religion, physchology, etc and all the questions they ask are the kind we would ask, and all the answers they get back, make complete sense. there’s no techno-babble, just real reasons as to how this caveman could actually be sharing the same air. they cover history and our perception and understanding of it, religion, and nature and how it works. everything about what we know and why we believe it is called into question.
this really is a true gem to watch.
it’s easy to miss a quiet diamond of a film like this in the shouty-ness [it’s a real word] of blockbuster movies, and it’s a big shame that most people will never have heard of ‘the man from earth’, but i for one owe a big thank you to a friend of mine for bringing this one to my attention.
trailer for the man from earth.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

we're all fighters

let me just say right off the bat that i’m not a particularly huge fan of boxing movies, or movies centred around sport generally. i believe we can all, to some degree, relate to the protagonist who rises beyond all expectation and belief to stand toe to toe with his biggest obstacle, slug it out, and win. this is why i think boxing movies get one over on most other sports movies – the fight!
for me a ‘boxing’ movie works best when the story being told is putting more of the emphasis on the characters than on the sport itself. million dollar baby, crying fist and raging bull do this tremendously.
which brings me to ‘the fighter’. this is a movie based on a true story. now from what i’ve read it’s pretty accurate – so far as the action in the ring and the background of the characters and the setting are concerned. that’s a good start, as most movies ‘based on a true story’ generally bear little semblance to the ‘true story’ from which they originate.
the big names in this movie are bale and wahlberg, as dicky and micky [i kid you not!].
there are certain actors who i really enjoy watching on screen, and among them is christian bale. the guy’s a marvel to watch, and here we have another incredible, memorable role from him. at first i thought he was being really ott as micky’s twitchy crack addicted trainer, but having seen footage of the real dicky, he’s actually pretty spot on. unfortunately i’m not a huge fan of wahlberg, i think he’s ok(ish) as an actor and this movie does nothing to change my opinion of his talents. he seems unable to muster up an expression that doesn’t involve frowning, which this role [fortunately] requires him to do a lot.
the movie is basically a biopic of micky’s struggle to become a successful boxer and to win the welterweight championship bout. but it’s actually more about his struggle to break free of the shackles of his overbearing mother/manager, his genius but very destructive brother/trainer, and the lack of self-belief in his own boxing ability.
alas, it can also be viewed with bale’s character as the main protagonist, with the fight being his road to a life worth living. a realisation that he is destroying himself, and that this is not the life he really wants to live. ultimately he wants to be the best mentor his brother could have but has demons of his own to defeat. dicky knows that unless he’s in micky’s corner - he will struggle against his opponents.
for me bale’s story arc was far more interesting than wahlberg’s, but both worked well together. the supporting roles are also wonderfully realised – girlfriend amy adams, playing a take-no-messing barmaid called charlene, wants for a better life, but is living with the results of some bad decisions. the boys’ mother, alice, has their best interests at heart, but lives by the statement “don’t trust no-one who ain’t family.”, and the 7 big-haired bitchy sisters!
the boxing aspect is pretty standard – the rise from underdog to champion, etc etc. the gloved up fights are good but not amazing. but this movie revolves more around the dramatic encounters of the family than it does the fights. the people here who should be loving and supporting each other are doing nothing of the sort, and it’s this that gives the movie it’s real strength – its heart, especially when things begin to go right… when they begin to forgive each other. this is when it becomes truly powerful.

we have all and probably will in our own lives find obstacles that we feel we cannot [and in many ways do not] want to acknowledge and tackle. there are fights that we feel we cannot win, that will destroy us. the reality is that sometimes in order to move forward we need to find ourselves at rock bottom.
now, we can choose to just lie there – defeated and broken, or we can look to our corner, and with the help of god, our family, and our friends… we can overcome the worst that life can throw at us.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

flynn lives... and rocks

i’m a huge fan of movies from the 70s. it’s a decade that gave us some of the best movies *ever* made. there's a grittiness to them, because moviemaking hadn’t fully entered into the realm of ‘wizardry pokery’ so they had to be stories that were interesting and exciting. but more importantly – because they had ’actors’ rather than celebrities. as an adult i love movies like the godfather, kramer vs kramer, jaws, badlands, the conversation, alien, rocky, the deer hunter, and apocalypse now to name but a few. there are few movies from that decade that i remember from my childhood – but those that i do i hold fondly, close encounters of the third kind, the fox and the hound, e.t., star wars, the towering inferno, superman, etc. but if you say two specific words to anyone [at least any boy] who grew up in the 70s you will see a smile appear on their face. those two words are ‘light cycles’.
i remember that as a kid that if you didn’t go to watch the latest movie at the cinema you had to wait the long 12 months for it to be released onto vhs [or beta as it was in our house!] otherwise you had to wait till christmas to watch your favourite films on the only 3 channels that were available way back then.
anyway, getting to the point - one of my childhood favourites is tron. tron is a real geekfest for someone who grew up alongside the dawn of video games and computers. it was so cutting edge and so so different to anything that had gone before. in fact if you’ve seen the matrix then you full well know that tron is where the idea of man made machines going bad and taking over came from.
getting even *more* to the point, this is not a review of the original tron from the early 80s. no siree, this is my short review of the latest movie i’ve watched this week. the follow up to tron. tron: legacy.
legacy begins in 1989, seven years after the events of the first movie. flynn (brilliant bridges) imparts a short catch up bedtime story to his son, then goes missing. sam [the son] grows up into a rebel of sorts and when he is told of a message from his father, he begins a journey that will take him into ‘the grid’ his father created. here he becomes a player in the now corrupt cyberworld controlled by the corrupt CLU [cgi bridges]. and so the story goes on.
first off i have to say that this tron movie is an absolutely incredible visual feast. the colous, the games [particularly the light cycles!], the sound - it’s stunning. in fact it’s the first film that i wish i’d seen in 3d.
set almost entirely in ‘the grid’ apart from the opening and ending, the film and it’s story is spellbinding. helping this atmosphere and overall feel of the future is the daft punk soundtrack which is just too cool! it’s the best soundtrack i’ve heard to a movie in years.
bridges has some great lines with "It was bio-digital jazz, man!" being amongst my favourites. is there nothing this dude can do to *not* be the best thing in any movie he is in. he’s not even the main charcter and he’s the one that sticks in your head when the movie is over! but if you blink you’ll miss the appearance of tron himself which was a little dissappointing - given the movie’s title and the fact that brucie boxleitner is also great. i really thought he’d play a bigger part than he did. shame. michael sheen comes very close to wrecking the movie with his ridiculous nightclub owner, but i won’t hold it against him - he’s memorable.
the movie is at heart a tale of good versus evil and is a refreshing change from some of the disney pap that gets churned out. or even the supposedly kid friendly movies that are as vacuous as a really vacuous thing in a very big vacuum. yes i’m looking at you marmaduke!
so after 30 years tron is back and i didn’t expect to, but i loved every minute of it.
as did my boys who watched it the night before me and informed me that “it was brilliant!”.
knowing how picky my boys can be about a movie - it’s high praise indeed.
anyway - you get light cycles!! that should be all that you need for a reason to go watch it.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

the bucket list: #1 do not watch the bucket list.

i don’t really like movies that blatantly manipulate your feelings, that play on your emotions so obviously, or set out to turn you from a strong man into a weeping mess on the sofa, but for one reason or another, i’d had quite an emotional weekend so when the good lady wife suggested we watch ‘the bucket list’, i was quite happy to sit through it, fully aware that it would probably destroy me!
now the director, rob reiner, has done some wonderful movies. ‘stand by me’ being my favourite – although others may choose ‘a few good men’ or ‘this is spinal tap’. but his last 10 or so movies haven’t really done anything to light up the movie world.
nicholson and freeman do well in their roles but they aren’t amazing. nicholson plays a filthy rich hospital exec who finds himself sharing a room with freeman, a working class family man. both are having treatment for terminal cancer. their time in hospital together is quite moving as they are like chalk and cheese – yet they have this bond, this sudden realisation that there is an urgency to the things they wish they had accomplished in their lives. the bucket list of things they see as must do’s – skydiving, kissing the most beautiful girl in the world, climbing the himalayas, seeing the pyramids, getting a tattoo, etc.
it’s obvious to any viewer that they didn’t splash out on the settings as their journey reminded me of those photos you see taken in front of billboards to make it look as if you were at the location. it was blatantly clear they were in front of a green screen of egypt, then off they went to get changed to return to a green screen of the taj mahal etc. while decidedly average, it was rather funny to watch.
there was also lots of material that could have been scripted here for serious discussion about life and death, faith and religion, the love of a family and the effect of loneliness. alas all these are just touched on and left me wanting more from these two acting powerhouses.
as i said, if you like to be spoonfed sentimentality, this may very well be for you. for those of us whose cinematic taste buds enjoy character development, authentic conversations and emotions, a believability to the characters and a little less [for want of a better word] mush, i warn you - if the bucket list catches you at the wrong time – you will leak profusely! so steer clear.
as for morgan and nicholson – they shouldn’t be wasting their time on stuff like this, there must be better scripts and movies for them to sign get involved in.

one final thing that did annoy me though – and it annoyed me big time.
how can your character narrate the story when your character is no longer living?

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

black swan review

darren aranofsky is a director who gives us some unforgettable movies, but the only one i have ever watched is underappreciated ‘the fountain’ which is a true thing of beauty [if a little bit of a mind melter]. his latest offering, black swan, is a strange yet enthralling thing of beauty. i’ve heard it called a thriller with elements of horror, but i disagree. this is for all intents and purposes a horror movie about insanity, obsession and the pursuit of one person’s own perfection, and it is at times truly terrifying. yet while terrifying, aranofsky has given us an incredibly well told, deeply touching portrait of natalie portman’s character, and she is fully deserving of any awards thrown at her for this role – it’s phenomenal.
portman is nina sayers, a ballerina who’s desperate to play the lead in her company's production of swan lake. she has mastered the aspect of the white swan, but being quite a fragile person she is struggling to find her inner black swan. with the combined oppressiveness of her overbearing mother, her barbaric director and fierce competitors, nina slowly descends into madness.
did i mention portman is phenomenal?...
you feel uneasy watching black swan and it has you on edge the whole time. it’s an incredible piece of work. like i say, this is a horror story and by the final third of the movie this aspect really starts to kick in. it’s a collection of psychological torture and physical horror. it's *very* creepy, and some of what you see will stay with you for days!
with black swan aronofsky has shown us that he can deliver an unforgettable experience.
i will not be watching it again, and i don't think it will be for everyone [wifey thinks it was absolutely awful!] but i'm glad i saw it, or rather - experienced it.
which brings me to my easter message!!
what of perfection? we are imperfect beings, we cannot be perfect no matter what we do or how hard we strive for it. but only through faith in the very real loving sacrifice of christ on the cross are we *all* washed clean of our wrongdoings and gain our rightful place in heaven with our creator. perfect!
-------------------------
you were saved by faith in god, who treats us much better than we deserve. this is god's gift to you, and not anything you have done on your own. it isn't something you have earned, so there is nothing you can brag about. god planned for us to do good things and to live as he has always wanted us to live. that's why he sent christ to make us what we are.

ephesians 2v8-10

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

another misleading movie poster

movie posters are a funny thing. who decides what it should look like? i sometimes wonder if the person designing the poster has in fact seen the movie – or even the trailer! ‘slumdog millionaire’ being the most obvious of late. ‘black snake moan’ is another, but i think this time it was deliberate and clever.
even if you haven't seen black snake moan [and you probably haven’t] you've no doubt seen the film's poster somewhere. it's a very provocative image of a tall black man holding a chain at the end of which is a young white woman, wearing what can only be described as ‘limited attire’. it looks like an exploitation flick. But it isn’t, oh no! surprisingly what you find is a rather old-fashioned tale of  redemption - albeit wrapped up in a somewhat steamy atmosphere.
black snake moan is at heart a tale of about two broken people with gaping holes in their lives, who find a connection. rae [ricci] is engaged to ronnie [timberlake]. he’s off on a tour of duty, and as soon as he has gone rae is in agony suffering from an itch which she can't help scratching - if you get my drift. this leads to her being found unconscious at the side of the road by mace windu, i mean lazarus. a religious man whose wife has recently abandoned him for his brother.
he takes her home and aims to cure her of her “sickness”. he has an interesting approach though - shackling her to his radiator with just enough slack to get around the house. which she obviously loves [not].
jackson’s roles usually rely on his screen presence but here his performance is truly authentic – you feel he really is a man who feels life is letting him down, a real bluesman. rae and lazarus are both performances that keep you interested in their story and where this relationship [for want of a better word] will go.
black snake moan is a strange film which has moments of brilliance, and moments that are not so brilliant. and for a movie that plays to it’s imagery so much – the chain being relevant to both rae and lazarus - it’s the fantastic blues soundtrack that stays with you long after the movie has finished.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

welcome to shutter island, we hope you enjoy your stay

the sure sign of a great movie is that when the credits are rolling – you wish you could watch it again… immediately!
this is no truer than with scorsese's incredible thriller, shutter island, which i watched for the second time last week.

in case you haven’t caught it, teddy (dicaprio’s troubled character) is a federal marshal sent to the island asylum to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a patient. accompanying him is his newly assigned partner chuck (raincoat ruffalo). you know immediately that this investigation is going to be anything but straight forward, especially when we meet up with dr. cawley (creepy kingsley), who proves to be of little help to our investigators.

scorsese has created an incredible visual treat. here we have a film noir that harks back to the old movies of hitchcock, and it effectively grabs you by the shoulders and drags you in. the dark lighting, long shadows, awesome music, the storm that isolates the island from the mainland, the lighthouse [who doesn’t love a creepy lighthouse?!?] and let’s not forget the memorable characters who occupy this mad island.

all that aside, it’s the raw emotion that you get from the movie of both the characters and their surroundings, that make this movie so incredible intense. all the characters serve a purpose, they are not just empty plot devices, and they are fully realised, and help make the movie deeply moving and occasionally very hard to watch.

this is not just a movie with adult content, this is one of those rare hollywood movies that’s not aimed at teenagers suffering from adhd. it’s an intelligent, emotional movie aimed at those of us who don’t just want to watch a movie – we want to experience it.

great filmmakers like scorsese, malick, haneke, salles, chan-wook park and aronofsky should all be encouraged [if not forced] to make films outside of their usual area of excellence and show the likes of bay, sommers, ratner and even spielberg a thing or six.

anyway – i digress – shutter island is a great example of a modern thriller, with an ending that has kept myself and my friends talking since i first saw it last year. 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

elizabeth

i’m not generally a fan of costume dramas, but i am known to partake of the odd one. going way back in our own history is intriguing, and when done this well, can be fascinating. i know that it’s never entirely structured on fact and there is always the element of having to please the viewer and bring home the bacon, but to get a glimpse of what life was like nearly 500 years ago is mesmerising.
the movie follows elizabeth i ascension and early days on the throne. she was the second daughter of king henry viii, and is a protestant. queen mary i, the first daughter of henry viii, is catholic as per her father. their religious differences threatens elizabeth's life [even the pope sanctioned her assassination!), and then severe illness sees off queen mary.
elizabeth is now queen and surrounded by advisors who may or may not be plotting against her. it’s gripping stuff.
cate blanchett is stunning as the young queen, and also geoffrey rush is brilliant as her ruthlessly loyal bodyguard, sir walsingham.
this is one of those historical dramas, when the final credits have rolled, that makes you want to go and find out more about this time in our country’s colourful history.
there are historical inaccuracies present – such as mary queen of scotts being killed in the chamber rather than beheaded – as the history books state. why this needed to be altered for the movie I do not know – but it doesn’t distract too much.
in my honest opinion we should be spending more time teaching our children the distant history of this country and a little less time focused on ww2.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

the hurt locker

well the student movie night didn't go quite as planned. there was some miscommunication regarding who was actually bringing along the dvd - resulting in us not having one to show. oops!
anyway, after gaz took a trip home [btw - i'm not referring to myself in the third person, it's a different gaz!] we settled down in the cold churchhouse loft with snacks and our very large screen to watch 'the hurt locker'.
i could go on about how it garnered best film oscar [amongst many] but i personally don't put any worth on the flakey goldness of the oscars as they really only have one purpose - and that's to do a little self glorification. as it stands, the hurt locker *was* the best film of that year... period!
so it was good to get a chance to watch it again. it's not really a standard war movie in that there is no over the top action, non-stop large scale battles, or even the psychological examinations a la platoon. it's a relatively small film, the focus being on one man and the 2 or 3 men who he works with. these guys are bomb disposal experts - in iraq. we come into the movie part way through their tour, ride along with them in the incredibly tense situations of ied's that they have to deal with along with snipers - they are never safe, and you get a real sense of that. then we leave them in the same way we were introduced to them. it's great to see a movie that breaks the mould.
that's all there is to this movie. it's tense, sometimes slow, often thoughtful, sometimes moving, always brilliant.
there were other good movies that year [avatar, inglourious basterds, district 9, up] but there really was no contender for *best* movie...

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

the book of eli

another movie night coming up this w/e with some friends and students from the uni.
the movie of choice this month is the ‘book of eli’. i have already seen this twice, but it's a good'un!
denzel is eli, a lone drifter travelling the open highways of a washed-out post-apocalyptic landscape. in his possession is the only remaining bible in the whole world [oddly enough, he also seems to be the only remaining black man!]. gary oldman is carnegie, a crazy [no surprises there] despot controlling/trying to control a small town. carnegie wants the bible so he can use it to… have more control over the people!
into town strolls eli, and that’s when the touch paper gets lit.
personally i’m a bit of  a fan of the post-apocalyptic genre, although some aspects do get rather repetitive - lone wanderer – check, washed out landscape – check, cannibalistic animal behaviour – check. however, this is not your usual run of the mill p-a movie. this is a far more powerful movie than you first realise.
the film is essentially a christian metaphor. eli appears to be protected by some greater supernatural force, on a journey guided by "God". this is a movie about faith and believing in something/someone bigger than yourself. if you haven’t already – go see.
even though it does have it’s weak points, this is an excellent film.
yes ‘the book of eli’ is violent – but so is most of the old testament. hey, sometimes desperate times call for desperate measures.
faith in the one true God in the world that we live in today looks a certain way, this same faith probably looked very different 200 years ago, and who knows how it will look in another 200 years. even in this day and age it differs from country to country. we are relatively un-persecuted here in the west, most of which amounts to people thinking of christians as different or weird or even weak in some way. our actual physical life and the lives of our loved ones are not threatened with *death* because of our faith in Jesus Christ. how much would we be willing to stand firm in our faith if it were *really* put to the test? would we cave in as the disciple peter did and deny him or would we stand strong and face the consequences?

Jesus said to martha: “the one who believes in me, even though he or she dies, will live. and everyone who lives believing in me does not ultimately die at all. do you believe this?"

so?... do you?...

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

one train you'll want to miss! [sorry]

"oh look, an unstoppable train."
truth time... i love tony scott movies. i know i know, they are loud, shaky, bold [in colour] and i think i'm right in saying - uses pretty much every trope going when it comes to action movies.
all the way from top gun through crimson tide, days of thunder, true romance, enemy of the state, deja vu, man on fire and even pelham 123, they are all great fun and cheesier than a giant cheese thing covered in cheese!
which is why i'm a little upset by having to confess that i absolutely hated unstoppable. i think he's gone too far. with both the tropes and the cheese!
i'm not giving anything away here when i tell you how the movie begins. see it as a warning if you will.
a huuuuuge freight train, uncoupled brakes that will be "connected when we've moved her to the other track!" [1st doh!]. a chubby driver who has to then disembark said train in order to change the track direction, obviously he doesn't make it [2nd doh!]. the jerking of the train causes the throttle lever to move into full steam ahead [3rd doh!]. a train full of school children coming straight at it on the same track [4th doh!]. denzel is a train driver a few days from retirement [5th doh!] and then there's the cocky rookie who comes good [6th doh!] and so on and so on ad nauseum.
it really doesn't get better. for instance half the movie is showing the story on foxnews, interviewing bystranders who are basically telling us what we are already watching on screen. *yawn*
i'm even bored of writing a review of it...
an unstoppable train that needs to be stopped but can't because it's unstoppable... until someone stops it!!
nuff said!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

movie vs book

haven’t written a movie review for a while. so let’s get stuck in…

the last movie i watched was the boy in the stripped pj's.
i read the book about two years ago and it blew me away. by the end i was crying like a little girl, and had to force myself to pick it up and finish reading it to it's inevitable heartbreaking ending.
i put off seeing this movie as i *knew* it wouldn't match up to the book, and i knew that however 'great' the film was, to me it would be a huge disappointment.
and so to the story.
it's 1942 in berlin, and a family receives good news: daddy has been promoted…
…however daddy’s promotion is to the post of commandant of an extermination camp.
this story, however, is not about daddy. It’s about bruno, his 8 year old son. bruno is blissfully unaware of what his father is involved in. to him the people in the fields out the back of his new home are just oddly dressed farm workers.
like so many young boys, bruno wants to be an explorer, and it’s bruno’s forbidden explorations in his back garden that bring him to the fence that surrounds the ‘farm’.
behind the fence sits a boy his own age, shmuel. shmuel is experiencing the same loneliness as bruno and very quickly a bond builds between the two boys, but they are both unaware of the horrible reality of their situation.
you can’t say that you “enjoy” a movie like this. you simply observe it and hopefully - if it’s been done right - it will absorb you. also – I feel I need to point out that this isn’t a war film. It’s a film about a family experiencing change beyond comprehension. coming to a realisation that so many must have gone through.
Even though I think the impact of the film was muted due to me having read the novel, I have to say this is one of the most human stories about this dark era that i have ever seen.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

discover the cove

i love a good documentary. i’m not talking about your al gore powerpoint nonsense, i’m talking about the ‘real’ documentary, where there is real footage with real people in real situations.
‘the cove’ is one such documentary.
it’s true that the best documentary is one that manipulates audience into accepting it’s viewpoint as the truth and nothing but the truth, but when the subject matter is as visceral as it is in this movie, it’s difficult to feel anything other than sickened.
‘the cove’ is directed by louie psihoyos, the founder of ops [oceanic preservation society], and his movie documents the goings-on in taiji, japan. taiji is a small place that to your normal visitor gives the impression that it loves sealife – there are boats shaped like whales and giftshops packed with fluffy dolphins and whales, flags, and other paraphernalia. however what actually happens in the town of taiji, between september and march every year, is the slaughter of thousands of dolphins!
ironically, the crusader for this cause is ric o'barry, the guy who trained and stared in ‘flipper’ in the 60s, and introduced the idea of capturing dolphins for ‘entertainment’. he has dedicated the last 35 years of his life as an activist against the capture and senseless killing of these beautiful, intelligent creatures.
the power and message of this movie is very hard to ignore.

as we grow up we are aware of certain causes that are fighting for the restoration of order to so much of this world. these kind of things have been happening for years, but i find it deeply disturbing that the older i get the more i discover about the wanton destruction of our planets habitats and life in almost every area.
we cannot be in-activists when we see so much that is wrong with this world that needs putting right. and as the movie says, we cannot wait for governments to make the changes that are needed, as the governments are part of the problem. we as individuals need to make a stand.
save the dolphin
save the whale
save the brown bear
save the trees
for goodness sake, we are stewards of this world. charged with it’s care and nurture by it’s creator.
…save the planet!

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS